In this preview from his upcoming Crushing PLO Tournaments course on Upswing, Dylan Weisman walks through a hand from a $75,000 Triton PLO final table at WSOP Paradise. The following video comes from his “Plan Explained” section, and it’s a great example of how ICM pressure, stack dynamics, and preflop decisions all play a role… The post ICM vs Chip Leader: How Dylan Weisman Navigates a Tough PLO Final Table Spot appeared first on Upswing Poker .
Tournament
1 min read
ICM vs Chip Leader: How Dylan Weisman Navigates a Tough PLO Final Table Spot
By Duncan Smith
|
Originally reported by
Upswing Poker
This story was originally reported by
Upswing Poker
RakebackHQ Take
Dylan Weisman navigating ICM pressure at a \$75K Triton PLO final table illustrates why PLO tournament play rewards both technical excellence and volume efficiency. PLO generates significantly more rake per hand than NLH due to larger pot sizes — which means PLO players accumulate rakeback faster at rooms with strong PLO reward structures. WPT Global stands out here: 30% flat rakeback on PLO regardless of volume tier, plus FairGame AI classification that can favor recreational-heavy tables for professionals. For players grinding PLO tournaments toward Triton-caliber buy-ins, optimizing rakeback on every PLO session accelerates bankroll growth. Compare PLO rakeback across rooms with our rakeback calculator.
